/images/sip2_logo.png
This plan was marked completed 2009-11-02T20:07:03. You can review it here
or view the final document.

Bi-Annual Review

For work completed:

Review SST Team Comments

School: Smith, Alice ES
Meeting Times(s):
April 6, 2010 and May 11, 2010 and June 8, 2010
Participating Team Members:
Administrator(s):
Sandra Aird; Jenni Anderson
SIP Team:
Michelle Cota; Vicki Moss; Robin Paris; Lyn Hawkins; Lucienne Wellman; Jody Rogers
Other stakeholder(s):
School Improvement Monitoring Plan Review:
(Check all that apply)		 Review SIP Monitoring Plan to ensure that proposed actions have been carried out as described in the plan
Review resources and budgets to ensure appropriate percentage of expenditures (grants and local funding sources)
Review student achievement data and update Action and Monitoring plans as needed
Consult the SIP Timelines for your school's calendar
Review the professional development action steps to be sure they have been carried out
Review the parent involvement activities to be sure they have been carried out
Assurance that all parent accords are signed and on file.
Review any previous Review Feedback Reports to determine if suggested changes have been addressed
Other areas reviewed by the Leadership Team:

Evidence of Plan Review

View/Edit Details Goal Strengths/Progress Concerns What needs to be adjusted or done differently in order to accomplish the stated goal?
1. ELA — Increase the percentage of students in every subgroup who are meeting or exceeding proficiency and decrease the percentage of the students in every subgroup who are emergent or approaching profieiency in English/Language Arts. Every subgroup will make AYP as measured by percent above cut. Bi-Annual Review The percent of student meeting/exceeding standards on the reading CRT increased in grade 4th, 5th and 6th. There was a decrease in the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in 3rd grade. Whole school, ESL, special education, and FRL populations did not meet the AYP target of 63.8% of students meeting or exceeding standards. Provide addition ESL and special education support for students moving into fourth grade for the 2010-2011 school year.
2. Math — Increase the percentage of students in every subgroup who are meeting or exceeding proficiency and decrease the percentage of students in every subgroup who are emergent or approaching proficiency in Math. Every subgroup will make AYP as measured by percent above cut. Bi-Annual Review The percent of students meeting or exceeding the standards on the CRT increased in 3rd, 4th and 5th grade. The percent of students meeting meeting or exceeding the standards on the CRT decreased in 6th grade. Whole school, ESL, special education, and FRL populations did not meet the AYP target of 65.9% of students meeting or exceeding standards. Implement math intervention block based on standards for the 2010-11 school year.
3. Writing — Increase the percentage of students who are meeting or exceeding proficiency and decrease the percentage of students in every subgroup who are emergent or approaching proficiency in Writing. Bi-Annual Review Step Up to Writing was implemented across all grade levels. 5th grade teacher met weekly to discuss writing strategies. The number of students recieving a 12 or better of the writing assessment remained at 28%. A school wide monthly trait focus will be implemented for the 2010-11 school year. Monthly prompts will be given to fifth grade students before the writing assessment. After the writing assessment 4th grade monthly writing prompts will be given. After the first trimester fifth grade students will have a common prompt which all 5th grade, ESL and Special Education teacher will analyze.

Follow-Up

Describe how this SIP review information will be shared and communicated with all stakeholders: Staff meeting
PTA/PTO
School newsletter
Conferences/Open house
Web page
Other (Describe):
Other Actions: List/Describe any requests for assistance, support, or resources:

SST Team Comments

No comments yet.