/images/sip2_logo.png
This plan was marked completed 2009-06-01T19:56:53. You can review it here
or view the final document.

Bi-Annual Review

For work completed:

Review SST Team Comments

School: Smith, Alice ES
Meeting Times(s):
June 9, 2009
Participating Team Members:
Administrator(s):
Sandra Aird; Jenni Anderson
SIP Team:
Corinne Hardy; Vicki Moss; Robert Fisher; Robin Paris; Jody Rogers; Linda McNine; Marcy Bien; Lucienne Wellman
Other stakeholder(s):
School Improvement Monitoring Plan Review:
(Check all that apply)		 Review SIP Monitoring Plan to ensure that proposed actions have been carried out as described in the plan
Review resources and budgets to ensure appropriate percentage of expenditures (grants and local funding sources)
Review student achievement data and update Action and Monitoring plans as needed
Consult the SIP Timelines for your school's calendar
Review the professional development action steps to be sure they have been carried out
Review the parent involvement activities to be sure they have been carried out
Assurance that all parent accords are signed and on file.
Review any previous Review Feedback Reports to determine if suggested changes have been addressed
Other areas reviewed by the Leadership Team:

Evidence of Plan Review

View/Edit Details Goal Strengths/Progress Concerns What needs to be adjusted or done differently in order to accomplish the stated goal?
1. ELA — Increase the percentage of students in every subgroup who are meeting or exceeding proficiency in English/Language Arts. Every subgroup will make AYP as measured by percent above cut (or safe harbor if necessary in the cases of ELL and Special Education students). Bi-Annual Review - CRT score school wide average is above 51% proficient. - Fidelity to the programs is achieving results. - $20,000 of new library book were purchased by Reading First funds. - ActiveBoards were installed in primary classrooms. - Students in ESL and IEP are not achieving at the targeted goal. - Many students have moved into the area after the school year had begun. - Create a master schedule in which no students are pulled during core instuction. - Hire two certified teachers for the ESL classes. - Focus on teaching vocabulary utilizing research based strategies
2. Math — Increase the percentage of students in every sub group who are meeting or exceeding proficiency in Math. Every subgroup will make AYP as measured by percent about cut (or safe harbor if necessary in the cases of ELL and Special Education students). Bi-Annual Review - Teachers have high expectations for students and communicate those expecations in class and at PLCs. - In PLC teachers are idenitifying students who struggle using benchmark data. These student receive additional instuction until they master the content. - Everyday math games are not used consistently across the grades. - Increase writing in the math block. - Math interventions need to increased using research based strategies. - Implement cross grade level tutoring. - Communicate math expectations to the parents.
3. Writing — Increase the percentage of students who are meeting or exceeding proficiency in Writing. Bi-Annual Review - Writing proficiency scores have remained below target for the past two years. - Implement the Step Up to Writing program. - Set goals and expectations across all grade levels to ensure a consistent building of writing skills.

Follow-Up

Describe how this SIP review information will be shared and communicated with all stakeholders: Staff meeting
PTA/PTO
School newsletter
Conferences/Open house
Web page
Other (Describe):
Other Actions: List/Describe any requests for assistance, support, or resources:

SST Team Comments

No comments yet.