/images/sip2_logo.png
This plan was marked completed 2007-12-25T00:21:21. You can review it here
or view the final document.

Bi-Annual Review

For work completed:

Review SST Team Comments

School: MELTON, ROLLAN ELEM
Meeting Date: May-01-2008
Time:
Place:
Participating Team Members:
Administrator(s):
Mary Slagle
SIP Team:
DeeLynn Armstrong; Patty Dalton; Catherine Lindesmith; Melody Martin; Mona Melton; Traci Mendoza; Jodee Prudente; Mary Slagle; Annie Solvason; Sandi Speirer; Traci Thomas; Janet Tidrick
Other stakeholder(s):
School Improvement Monitoring Plan Review:
(Check all that apply)		 Review SIP Monitoring Plan to ensure that proposed actions have been carried out as described in the plan
Review resources and budgets to ensure appropriate percentage of expenditures (grants and local funding sources)
Review student achievement data and update Action and Monitoring plans as needed
Consult the SIP Timelines for your school's calendar
Review the professional development action steps to be sure they have been carried out
Review the parent involvement activities to be sure they have been carried out
Assurance that all parent accords are signed and on file.
Review any previous Review Feedback Reports to determine if suggested changes have been addressed
Other areas reviewed by the Leadership Team:

Evidence of Plan Review

View/Edit Details Goal Strengths/Progress Concerns What needs to be adjusted or done differently in order to accomplish the stated goal?
1. Math — Our goal is to reduce the number of non-proficient students in math. RTI and AIMSweb training completed by staff Entire school baselines completed to target low performing students Edusoft training completed by staff and used as part of data collection Grant for Compass learning obtained and program obtained, program used for RTI Tier I, II, and III interventions River Deep Program used for program used for RTI interventions PLC meetings to discuss low performing students and interventions Marzano, Classroom Instruction that Works used in classrooms Classroom teachers limited time to evaluate data Additional research based RTI interventions available for classroom use Lack of technology in classrooms Limited instructional training for staff i.e. GLAD If funds become avaiable staff training for GLAD, purchase research based interventions and interactive whiteboards. If funds become avaialbe hire an Response to Intervention specialist to assist teachers in evaluating data and providing interventions for low performing students
2. ELA — Our goal is to reduce the number of non-proficient students in English/Language arts. RTI and AIMSweb training completed by staff Entire school baselines completed to target low performing students Edusoft training completed by staff and used as part of data collection Grant for Compass learning obtained and program obtained, program used for RTI Tier I, II, and III interventions River Deep Program used for program used for RTI interventions PLC meetings to discuss low performing students and interventions Marzano, Classroom Instruction that Works used in classrooms Classroom teachers limited time to evaluate data Additional research based RTI interventions available for classroom use Lack of technology in classrooms Limited staff instructional training i.e GLAD If funds become available staff training for GLAD, purchase research based interventions and interactive whiteboards. If funds become available hire an Response to Intervention specialist to assist teachers in evaluating data and providing interventions for low performing students

Follow-Up

Establish the next SIP review meeting: Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
Other members to invite:
Describe how this SIP review information will be shared and communicated with all stakeholders: Staff meeting
PTA/PTO
School newsletter
Conferences/Open house
Web page
Other (Describe):
Other Actions: List/Describe any requests for assistance, support, or resources:

SST Team Comments

No comments yet.